If it wasn't for our spooks.

These charmers would've killed 5,000 innocent people.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2626700/Terrorists-bid-to-kill-5000-in-4-hours.html

Discuss.

They missed this one:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8243204.stm

How many could he have hurt/killed?

When they are following good policies they do a good job and when they are following bad policies they do a good job

Old_Punk wrote:They missed this one:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8243204.stm

How many could he have hurt/killed?

When they are following good policies they do a good job and when they are following bad policies they do a good job

But contribute alot more to society than you do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or you.

If you have come here to troll me JO you wont last long at all.

There are a lot of unsung heroes out there Men and Women, who put their lives on the line to protect this country, and dont get the glory James Bond gets. :coolsmiley: we may be the most watched country with cctv, but if it saves thousands of lives it must be worth it. How did the spooks enter the flat, drill into the wall and insert a mini radio remote TV camera without it being spotted.

Old_Punk wrote:Or you.

If you have come here to troll me JO you wont last long at all.

A bit like your debating skills!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Still making up facts to suit your argument????????????????????????????????????????????????

Old_Punk wrote:Or you.

Please can you explain that comment??????????????????????????????????????

MickyMod wrote:These charmers would've killed 5,000 innocent people.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2626700/Terrorists-bid-to-kill-5000-in-4-hours.html



Discuss.

2 points i wish to make:

1. these 3 terrorists were convicted exactly a year to the day that 3 other muslim terroroists were convicted. what style! these trials are definitely "choreographed"!!
(i have noticed that some racism trials are also choreograhed for the verdict /sentence to be announced on the very anniversary that anti-racists campaigners died. i just happen to be an observant soul, where these matters are concerned)


2. it cost a cool £60million to bring these rogues to justice (for the third time of asking, 2 previous trials were aborted!!). there are a few rich lawyers counting their money today!

Me I don't believe a word of it!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:Or you.

If you have come here to troll me JO you wont last long at all.

A bit like your debating skills!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Still making up facts to suit your argument????????????????????????????????????????????????

Get Swiftcovered JO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/kids.asp

Thatcher's charity website says:

MT had a bad time as Education Minister, especially in her first year. She was attacked by people who were annoyed that she had abolished free school milk for older children (she got the nickname "Milk snatcher").

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:Or you.

Please can you explain that comment??????????????????????????????????????

Jobless people dont contribute very much to society - far less than carers

Punk and Jo, stop this pointless sniping please.

Thanks.

Old_Punk wrote:Get Swiftcovered JO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/kids.asp

Thatcher's charity website says:

MT had a bad time as Education Minister, especially in her first year. She was attacked by people who were annoyed that she had abolished free school milk for older children (she got the nickname "Milk snatcher").

Still churning out incorrect facts?????????????????????????????????????????????

Old_Punk wrote:
Jobless people dont contribute very much to society

thats a bit of a generalisation, isn't it??????????????????????????????????????????????

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:Get Swiftcovered JO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/kids.asp

Thatcher's charity website says:

MT had a bad time as Education Minister, especially in her first year. She was attacked by people who were annoyed that she had abolished free school milk for older children (she got the nickname "Milk snatcher").

Still churning out incorrect facts?????????????????????????????????????????????

I was quoting from her charity website.

:wavingsmily: :wavingsmily: :wavingsmily:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:
Jobless people dont contribute very much to society

thats a bit of a generalisation, isn't it??????????????????????????????????????????????

It is a known fact. How can they on £60 a week? Or do you think they contribute more than someone working?

You could be indepently wealthy and contribute quite a bit to society

Old_Punk wrote:I was quoting from her charity website.

:wavingsmily: :wavingsmily: :wavingsmily:

How many times do I have to tell you that Thatcher did not make the final descision for the withdrawl of free milk to primary school children??????????????????????????????????????????????????

Infact she was against it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :wavingsmily:

Old_Punk wrote:It is a known fact. How can they on £60 a week? Or do you think they contribute more than someone working?

It's a known fact that bigots generalise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :wavingsmily:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:It is a known fact. How can they on £60 a week? Or do you think they contribute more than someone working?

It's a known fact that bigots generalise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :wavingsmily:

Leave the insults out please Jo.

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:I was quoting from her charity website.

:wavingsmily: :wavingsmily: :wavingsmily:

How many times do I have to tell you that Thatcher did not make the final descision for the withdrawl of free milk to primary school children??????????????????????????????????????????????????

Infact she was against it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :wavingsmily:

so why doesn't her website or autobiography state that?

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:It is a known fact. How can they on £60 a week? Or do you think they contribute more than someone working?

It's a known fact that bigots generalise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :wavingsmily:

So stop generalising then, JO. Simples

Old_Punk wrote:so why doesn't her website or autobiography state that?

Because it has become a political myth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anyone with an ounce of political knowledge will tell you this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:so why doesn't her website or autobiography state that?

Because it has become a political myth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anyone with an ounce of political knowledge will tell you this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so why does her autobiography and charity website say the opposite of what you are saying?

Is she lying? Is her website lying? :wavingsmily:

Old_Punk wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Old_Punk wrote:so why doesn't her website or autobiography state that?

Because it has become a political myth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anyone with an ounce of political knowledge will tell you this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so why does her autobiography and charity website say the opposite of what you are saying?

Is she lying? Is her website lying? :wavingsmily:

They're not lying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They're just like you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MISINFORMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!