Should page 3 be banned.

Labours politically correct harridan Harriet 'Harperson' wants to ban page 3.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/mysun/2657849/Is-boob-ban-a-barmy-plan.html

Whats your view.

I think it should be banned! as well as lap-dancing clubs etc...it all devalues women! we're not just sex objects you know! not all the time anyway!

my view is they should allow gratiutious otter and beaver ! but to exclude my daily dose of tits then they will have to show Cameron and Griffin a nd Cleggs picture on page three instead as they are the biggest tits about (next to Jordans)

I agree with Lexi;Yes, it should be banned. Titilation of this nature in a national newspaper is an archaic concept. Common, disrepectful and ought to be confined to history.

sheesh I am a good "Catholic" boy and I seriously do not mind seeing as beautiful woman in the all together !! although I draw a line with porn

I'm not bothered.I prefer to see real tits!

DreamTwister wrote:I'm not bothered.I prefer to see real tits!

There's a few in forumland DT, and you aint gotta look too far either son. :rofl;:

You guys talking about me again

Lily-Pad wrote:You guys talking about me again

Never said a word Frogster. :eyeroller:

MickyMod wrote:

DreamTwister wrote:I'm not bothered.I prefer to see real tits!

There's a few in forumland DT, and you aint gotta look too far either son.

I would'nt ban p3. Men will always leer at pretty girls. They may as well leer at the ones who are getting paid well, and leave the rest alone.

Can we have a page 3 on here? Female Spa members only may apply!!

I don't have a problem with Page 3.... they're just boobs FGS !!

Yep, you see alot more on the beach.

DreamTwister wrote:Can we have a page 3 on here? Female Spa members only may apply!!

I certainly look into them i mean it DT. :coolsmiley:

would someone post a page 3 pic so I can give an informed opinion on the matter?

Dont you have the equivalent in the States., Chronos?

chronos wrote:would someone post a page 3 pic so I can give an informed opinion on the matter?

Here's a link for you mate.

http://www.page3.com/girl/michelle_marsh/index.shtml

It is entirely in keeping with the rest of modern UK.

Syl wrote:

MickyMod wrote:

DreamTwister wrote:I'm not bothered.I prefer to see real tits!

There's a few in forumland DT, and you aint gotta look too far either son.

I would'nt ban p3. Men will always leer at pretty girls. They may as well leer at the ones who are getting paid well, and leave the rest alone.

'Leave the rest alone' ? on the contrary, it creates a climate of 'acceptability'

Does this view entirely square with your disapproval of Jordan S yl? or did she just take it too far, iyo. She made millions, you seem here to approve of the savvy lucrativeness of it?

I don't care either if a woman makes her money via her physicality, it's the daily national newpaper aspect that I think is wrong. These sexually presented breasts are clear to see, on the bus, in the doctors waiting room, on a park bench,on the train, anywhere this paper is being read, quite unique in a sense, as these images don't generally appear in that manner! and it's sending all the wrong messages out to especially very young girls, to males and is disrespectful to the women around.
Why does it need to be there?

I just wish they'd do a 'Page 3' for us girls !!

Pocahontas wrote:I just wish they'd do a 'Page 3' for us girls !!

No you don't!

Vilipend wrote:

Pocahontas wrote:I just wish they'd do a 'Page 3' for us girls !!

No you don't!

Do !

Fair enough, cometh the hour cometh the man...
I'll see if I can find some of my old polaroids...

Vilipend wrote:Fair enough, cometh the hour cometh the man...
I'll see if I can find some of my old polaroids...

OLD POLAROIDS ??????????

It's alright, I've changed the sofa.